relation to specific animal contacts.
A further degree of perversion in this direction Big But Women is reached in a case of
erotic _zoophilia_, recorded by Krafft-Ebing.[40] In this Big But Women case a
congenital neuropath, of good intelligence but delicate and anæmic, with
feeble sexual powers, Big But Women had a Big But Women great love of domestic animals, especially
dogs and cats, from Big But Women an early age; when petting them he experienced sexual
emotions, although he was innocent in sexual matters. At puberty Big But Women he
realized the nature of his feelings and tried to break himself of his
habits. He succeeded, but then began erotic dreams accompanied by images
of animals, and these led to masturbation associated with ideas of a
similar kind. At the same time he had no wish for any sort of sexual
intercourse with animals, and
was indifferent as to the sex of the animals
which attracted him; his sexual ideals were Big But Women normal. Such a case seems Big But Women to
be fundamentally one of fetichism on a tactile basis, and thus forms a
transition between the stuff-fetichisms and the complete perversions of
sexual attraction toward animals.
In some cases sexually hyperæsthetic women have informed me that
Big But Women sexual feeling Big But Women has been produced by casual contact with pet Big But Women dogs
and cats. In such cases there is usually no real perversion, Big But Women but
it seems probable that we may here have an occasional foundation
for the somewhat morbid but scarcely vicious excesses of
affection which women are apt to display Big But Women towards their pet dogs
or cats. In most cases of Big But Women this affection there is certainly no
sexual element; in the case of childless women, it may rather be
regarded as a Big But Women maternal than as an Big But Women erotic symbolism. (The excesses
of this non-erotic zoophilia have been discussed by Féré,
_L'Instinct Sexuel_, second edition, pp. 166-171.)
Krafft-Ebing considers that complete Big But Women perversion of sexual attraction
toward animals is radically distinct from erotic _zoophilia_. This view
cannot be accepted. Bestiality and _zooerastia_ merely present in a more
marked and profoundly perverted form a further degree of Big But Women the same
Big But Women phenomenon which we meet with in erotic _zoophilia_; Big But Women the difference is
that they occur
either in more insensitive or in more markedly degenerate
persons.
A fairly typical case of _zooerastia_ has been recorded in America by
Howard, of Baltimore. This was the case of a boy of Big But Women 16, precociously
mature and fairly bright. He was, however, indifferent to the opposite